1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Maude
  8. The Braiser
Media Monster

The FCC Voted To Eliminate Sports Blackouts On TV… But It Means Nothing, Because Sports Commissioners Suck


Roger Goodell Steroids HGH

I saw that “The FCC has voted unanimously to eliminate the sports blackout rules” was the top headline on r/sports this morning, and like most people, I got excited. Even if your team isn’t often blacked out, there’s no upside to the possibility of TV blackouts for fans (except schadenfreude toward fans of blacked-out rivals).

The move comes as changes in the marketplace have raised questions about whether it is in the public interest to maintain the blackout, particularly at the current price of a ticket and the state of the economy. That was then acting chairwoman Mignon Clyburn’s argument for teeing up the item for a vote during her busy tenure.

Cool! A government agency acknowledged that tickets are expensive and that blackouts are bullshit, and did something! Great.

But:

The elimination of the rule does not mean that sports leagues and broadcasters–or cable operators or satellite operators–can’t strike private agreements that include such blackouts.

Oh.

And as you likely know, sports commissioners (who, remember, work to protect the interests of team owners) suck and only care about profits, and are typically in favor of TV blackouts, because they encourage ticket sales.

Likely, blackouts will still exist for now.

But, there’s also this:

“However, we’re concerned that today’s proposal may hasten the migration of sports to pay-TV platforms, and will disadvantage the growing number of people who rely on free, over-the-air television as their primary source for sports. Allowing importation of sports programming on pay-TV platforms while denying that same programming to broadcast-only homes would erode the economic underpinning that sustains local broadcasting and our service to community.”

The NFL agrees and has argued that getting rid of the rule would “undermine the retransmission-consent regime and give cable and satellite operators excessive leverage in retransmission-consent negotiations.”

This all makes sense. It’s intuitive that sports subscription packages are coming, especially online-streaming versions. These things are potentially both good and bad, depending on your own circumstances and the intricacies of what actually happens, so, we’ll just have to wait and see.

There’s only one thing we don’t have to wait to see: that sports commissioners suck.

[Multichannel]


  • Filed Under:
  • Ted Tidwell

    I forgot, in the constitution the founders granted us the right to watch our favorite sports team on our tvs for free…part of the reason we broke away from King George III. Pay subscription has been the model for FIFA and the Premier League for decades. You think that sucks? Just wait until you have to by separate tv licenses to watch the game on the multiple tvs in your house.

  • Anonymous

    Is this directed at me? I didn’t say that a pay model sucks; I said that blackouts suck. Blackouts suck.

  • Ted Tidwell

    I live in a market where there is a 12 year season ticket wait list, and tickets are going for double face, and will now have to buy television games (or at least will in the near future). $hit, cities like San Diego give their tickets away practically to prevent blackouts on game day. I really don’t feel that bad for fans who have to endure blackouts, because you probably live in a city where the going price of a game day ticket is heavily discounted


© 2014 SportsGrid, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram | Sports Statistics Provided By Rotowire