This Was Definitely Not The Actual Score Of Last Night’s UCLA-Stanford Game

by Glenn Davis | 1:36 pm, October 2nd, 2011

As we mentioned earlier, Stanford beat UCLA last night 45-19. Given that final score, it’s especially unlikely that UCLA was leading by a score of 99-0 – and apparently had the ball and a chance to push into the triple digits – midway through the first quarter. But Reddit user skisaj12 caught ESPN’s Bottom Line saying just that (as did our own Tim Burke, whose screencap you can see above), and we thank them for it. While every offense might dream of moving the ball well enough to score 14 touchdowns (plus one successful two-point conversion) in six minutes, not even the mighty Andrew Luck led the victorious Cardinal to such heights last night.

Biggest Hits

RotoExperts

Error! Please enter a valid email.

Error connecting to RotoExperts server.

Success! You are now a RotoExperts subscriber.

You're already subscribed.

WAG Spotting

MLB's 50 Hottest

Paulina Gretzky

Follow SportsGrid

Now Tweeting

The Best of Twitter

Evan Woodbery We're talking UT football and previewing the 2013 season today on the @KNSsportspage . Listen live: http://t.co/UPuJa5x3Sr

Bomani Jones column’s up. lebron, legacies and how we decide who even has one http://t.co/jNEM8MHCMx

Jason Whitlock Hmm. Good one. Did Riley have an option on bench? Pop had Neal. RT @dmelendi: Pat Riley left John Starks in to go 2-for-18

Bill Barnwell Today at @grantland33: Does a hot end to the NFL season (like the #Bengals and #Redskins) carry over to the new year? http://t.co/WKiZ6OWt6i

Jimmy Traina Also in AM Hot Clicks, props to @kevinlove for a solid Tony Parker/Eva Longoria tweet. http://t.co/ueeBwyKnuN