1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Maude
  8. The Braiser
BasketballESPNNBAThey Said What?

Dwight Howard Thinks The World Revolves Around Him And I’m Not Surprised At All


ESPN ran an article this morning detailing why Dwight Howard chose not to return to the Lakers. According to the article, Dwight was pissy that the Lakers wouldn’t push out one of the best players in the history of basketball — Kobe Bryant — to make way for King Howard’s reign in Los Angeles.

ESPN can not call out a professional athlete for being a selfish piece of shit; that’s what I’m here for. So let’s take a look at what the article had to say and bash Dwight Howard along the way.

Dwight Howard’s distaste for the offense and approach of coach Mike D’Antoni is widely cited as the biggest trigger in his decision to leave the Los Angeles Lakers. But another key factor that led the All-Star center to the Houston Rockets was the Lakers’ refusal to establish a clear timetable for moving on from the Kobe Bryant era, according to sources with knowledge of Howard’s thinking.

Let’s get this straight: Dwight Howard, a seven-time All-Star, zero-time NBA champion, wanted the Lakers to give him a good idea of when they were going to get rid of Kobe Bryant, a 15-time All-Star, five-time NBA champion, two-time NBA Finals MVP, and the 2008 NBA MVP.

Kobe is undoubtedly on the decline, but he’s one of the best players ever to set foot on an NBA court. The Lakers aren’t going to be “establishing a clear timetable” to move on from Kobe Bryant. He can and will retire on his own terms.

Sources told ESPN.com that Howard and his representatives — in a handful of meetings with Lakers officials before he became a free agent July 1 — strongly suggested the center would have a difficult time re-signing with the team if Bryant stayed with the franchise beyond the 2013-14 season, the final year of his contract.

Wait, so were the Lakers supposed to force out Kobe Bryant in a year in order to keep a guy that’s been an absolute poison on the roster? He was just joking right?

Howard’s camp at one point asked the Lakers whether they were at least considering releasing Bryant through the league’s amnesty provision, since Bryant’s return date from Achilles tendon surgery remained in question. Releasing Bryant via the amnesty provision and shopping Pau Gasol and Steve Nash to teams with salary-cap space would have allowed the Lakers to try to recruit [Howard and Chris] Paul in free agency.

No, it appears he wasn’t joking. Dwight Howard and his crack team of representatives — his “camp” — actually asked the Lakers if they considered amnestying Kobe Fucking Bryant. He then wanted the team to trade Steve Nash and Pau Gasol, two other players that have accomplished much more in their careers than Howard has, to sign him and a friend. He was a free agent and he was trying to dictate what roster moves the Lakers should make. Even worse, he wanted them to amnesty Kobe Bryant.

One source added that Howard had concerns about how the Lakers planned to market him after being disappointed with the franchise in that aspect last season.

Is Dwight Howard really that vain and self-centered that he was upset with the way the team was marketing him? Did he need more commercials? More billboards? A gigantic banner on the side of the Staples Center with his face for the entire season?

There were also reports last week when Howard was still a free agent that he wanted the Houston Rockets to add a third superstar. Howard had the audacity to ask the Rockets, who had just spent most of the previous week moving around players to find the cap room to sign him, how they were going to be able to position themselves to offer a second max contract in addition to his.

Howard must have missed that thing the Miami Heat did where none of their “Big Three” took on max contracts because you can’t build a successful basketball team while dedicating that much cap space to just three players. If Howard wanted another superstar in Houston and really only cared about winning a championship as he claimed, maybe he could have lived off of, say, $15 million a year instead of the $22 million that he signed for.

Moral of the story: Dwight Howard is a selfish asshole who thinks that the basketball revolves around him.


  • Anonymous

    All this is just spewing biased crap-opinions unless you are naming sources. He gave up $30M to play with the best young team that made the playoffs, led by a stellar young star. I don’t know a selfish person who would turn down tens of millions using the kind of BS logic of your article. Style of play likely figured into his thinking, but I believe it is the stellar youth, potential for rapid improvement and esprit de corps of the Rockets that captured his imagination. I read his motive as just wanting to play in a better situation (where all the star players are early 20s and with a coach who can better help Dwight realize his potential) with regard to winning championship over the next 5 years. Giving up $30M is not selfish, it simply reflects his clear-eyed understanding of the truth that the Rockets are much better positioned to win chaimpionships for the rest of his career than are the Lakers. Winning big over the coming five years is clearly more important than money to Dwight, and it is hard to argue with his decision unless you view the world from La La Land where the logic can be suspended at will.

  • JohnFalcigie

    Selfish? Are you kidding me?

    1)He left $30million in guaranteed money on the table.
    2)He was the 1st major free agent to leave the Lakers, choosing winning over legacy

    Take a look at Kobe if you want to suggest selfish, he was unwilling to give up anything in terms of his game for the better of the team. He averaged a ton of points last year, while his team barely made the playoffs. If you were a Houston fan, you would be writing how the move made so much sense for him.

    For the record, i am neither a Houston or Lakers fan. I am an Orlando fan and wish he stayed, so unlike most Magic fans, I am not hating on him for it, he gave 8 great years to Orlando.

    For a player in the prime of his career, he chose wisely, picking an injury free Houston team loaded with young talent that will be in contention for several years, instead of an old injury laded Lakers squad that will likely see Nash, Kobe & Pau missing several games next year due to injuries.

  • Anonymous

    You and I see this decision the same way, even tho I am Houson fan. I too have watched Howard over the years – while he has some maturity/ego issues (as does the majority of star NBA players, excluding Tim Duncan), the decision to choose the Rockets over the Lakers was a no-brainer for an already rich athlete who values “having fun while being on a lot better team next year and the next and the next” over getting a little richer.

  • GL333

    Both are selfish. Except one has the hardware and the other one is jealous!

  • Adsdas Dsfdfasd

    Get off the Kobe hate you losers. Dwight hasn’t won shit in this league and tried to pull strings all over the place as if he has the clout to do it. He’s selfish and he’s shown it plenty of times over the last 3 years. Is he going to win a title in Houston in the next 4 years? No. The lakers have the track record of reloading quickly and he still left because they wont release a top 10 player in history. Kobe doesn’t have to give up any control of the team to a clown like Dwight. Dwight wouldnt even set a worthy pick/screen last season, and Kobe is suppose to reliquish organizational power to him?

    Get off Dwight’s nuts you faggots.


© 2014 SportsGrid, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram | Sports Statistics Provided By Rotowire