- The 13 Best Moments From Eli Manning's Epic Reddit AMA
- Bob Arum: Pacquiao Mayweather Fight Going To Happen In 2015
- This Is Totally Your Year: The 2014-15 Arizona Cardinals Season Preview
- Disguised Nick Foles Catches Fantasy Drafters Not Drafting Nick Foles
- Tony Stewart: Kevin Ward Jr.'s Death Will Affect Me Forever
San Francisco Chronicle Latest Newspaper To Dump ‘Redskins’ Nickname
Daniel Snyder met with Roger Goodell today and reportedly said that he still has no plans to change the ‘Redskins’ nickname. Even as: 1. Pressure mounts to change it, 2. The team continues to lose, 3. Newspapers and other sports sources are refusing to use it, 4. The whole thing is making him look like an ass.
The latest? The San Francisco Chronicle will not be referring to Washington’s NFL team by its nickname. That’s according to a report by NBCSports. The Chronicle has not made an announcement, but NBC’s Pro Football Talk says that a communication within the organization ordered the nickname banned.
The tipping point for the Chronicle may have come two weeks ago, in Callie Millner’s editorial ‘Redskins name doomed to dustbin of history.’ In it, she recalls the story of a couple she knows, of Cheyenne and Arapaho descent, who attended their first Washington Redskins game, about 40 years ago. Many fans, said the couple, could not resist :poking” and “touching” them, and stroking their hair: in other words, treating them like mascots, and not people. She too believes the nickname should go.
Millner’s is a poignant and well-reasoned argument, and the Chronicle must have agreed.
The 49ers play Washington on Nov. 25. Be sure to check in on SFgate.com after that one.
- Filed Under:
- MMA Fans Protest Over Brock Lesnar
- Arlovski Speaks up on Klitschko Brothers and UFC Return
- Savage Punishment for Laying Hands on Referee
- So What Does Bill Belichick Think About Weed?