1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Maude
  8. The Braiser
NHL

4 Practical Ways The NHL Can Make More Money When It Comes Back


This is a guest post from Brandon Steiner, the CEO of Steiner Sports and the author of this fantastically-named book.

Last week, we learned that the NHL cancelled all games through December 14, in addition to the All-Star game, due to the current lockout between the league and the players’ association. It’s a messy situation, and the window in which it can be (somewhat) rectified is getting increasingly smaller.

According to my calculations, the NHL has about four more days in which the two sides can hammer out a deal and still play a 60-game season (the bare minimum for legitimacy) plus playoffs. Starting the season over four days from now would lead to it possibly running into July, which is infeasible for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that you’d have a hard time finding a playoff hockey audience during the summer, with the baseball and summer travel seasons in full swing.

In a statement made November 24th, NHLPA executive director Donald Fehr said the gap between the two sides on “core economic issues is $182 million,” which is roughly the amount of money the league loses every 10 days there’s no hockey being played. 10 days. So clearly, the two sides are capable of fighting over a pack of tic-tacs. I’m not sure more profits would help prevent future lockouts.

But it couldn’t hurt, and with hockey on hiatus, this might be a good time to consider these four revenue enhancements:

1. Lose some seats, gain some ice.

Before 2010, when the Olympics switched to using NHL-sized rinks, Olympic hockey made us feel like the NHL games we had been watching were being played inside sardine trays. We loved Olympic hockey partly because the rink was bigger, which allowed for smoother, more graceful play (197 x 98.4 ft. compared to 200 x 85 ft.). The NHL should remove some first-row seats from its arenas in order to expand the size of the ice. Yeah, you might lose a little revenue, but the style of hockey will improve, leading to more eyeballs, leading to more revenue in the long run.

2. Reduce the size of the goalie’s pads.

I realize the league has already taken some steps in this direction, but guess what – it can afford to take a few more. People like to joke about putting a sumo wrestler between the pipes; sometimes I look at all the padding goalies wear, and I wonder what the difference is. They take up a lot of space. Keep those guys protected, while leaving the net a little more vulnerable: they should look more like baseball catchers than pituitary cases.

3. Give each team a real timeout.

Did you know each side in a NHL game only gets one 30-second timeout, and it has to be taken after play has already been stopped? I realize a major appeal of hockey is that it’s fast-paced, with breakneck player substitutions, but c’mon – this is a pro sport. We don’t need to squeeze each game into that tight of a window. Give each team one, honest-to-God timeout per game, with which it can stop the action, substitute the right players, and then run some kind of set play. This will only increase the quality of the product.

4. Make the helmets cooler.

The helmets are so boring the way they are: all one color with a little team decal. If you’re watching a game on TV, these are the things you see the most of. So: take a cue from the goalies, and make them cooler-looking.

The founder & CEO of Steiner Sports Marketing & Memorabilia, Brandon Steiner is also an author and inspirational speaker. Buy his latest book, You Gotta Have Balls, here. Follow his thoughts for free by visiting his blog, Facebook, or Twitter page.



  • Anonymous

    Practical?! Are
    you out of your head-down-concussed mind?! This lockout has clearly
    numbed those hockey brain cells. A time-out DURING the action?! As if
    this sport doesn’t already have enough needless injuries. So, the whistle
    blows on a clear-cut breakaway?! Or right before a Stevens-wannabe hits a Lindros-learned skater?! OMG!
    LOL!

    And while I am all for a 200 x 100 rink, considering we are
    witness to months of quibbling over who gets what micro-percentages of
    revenue sharing, just don’t quite see how ripping out ANY seats would
    EVER fly in this nit-picking environment.

    But yeah, funky helmets.
    That’ll bring in millions! LOL!

  • Anonymous

    Worst hockey article I’ve ever read. You should be ashamed of yourself.

    Out of everything you could possibly say, and you go to styling the helmets.

    You are an idiot. I would hate to see your practical solutions for life at home.

  • http://zachhalverson.com Zach Halverson

    #2 was the only “practical” way. The rest were foolish. How is renovating 30 arenas practical? How does making the helmets look cooler make the league more money? How does a timeout during action make the game any more appealing than the NBA who is struggling because viewers are complaining of, well, too much commercials and breaks. I have no idea how something like this could be given such a national platform when I know so many hockey writers personally who would do so much better.


© 2014 SportsGrid, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram | Sports Statistics Provided By Rotowire