Several Teams Carry Four QBs: Strategy or Misstep?

Segment Spotlight: Quick Hits From Game Time Decisions

Quarterback Dilemmas and Last-Minute Roster Moves

The Cleveland Browns have raised eyebrows with their decision to keep four quarterbacks on their roster, even though only Dylan Gabriel is marked to start the season on the EIL. This overstock at the quarterback position might signal a lack of confidence in their current lineup, as it's often said: "If you have four quarterbacks, you don't have one." This situation hints at a potentially challenging season for the Browns, reflecting a possible lack of depth in critical areas.

Meanwhile, the Miami Dolphins are also under scrutiny after choosing to pick up seven new players, which could indicate dissatisfaction with their pre-existing roster following the offseason and draft periods. Miami’s decision to overhaul their lineup so drastically this late hints at desperation, underscoring major concerns as none of the cut players were claimed on waivers, yet replacements were found among those discarded by other teams.

Interestingly, various NFL teams are holding onto four quarterbacks heading into the season, which may appear excessive or strategic depending on the outlook. The Eagles, for example, retained Jalen Hurts, Tanner McGee, Andy Dalton, and Cole Payton. The decision to keep multiple quarterbacks is suggestive of potential trades or ensuring depth due to injury concerns. Similarly, the Steelers and Falcons have also stocked up on quarterbacks despite the approaching season start, indicating a trend of caution or perhaps a strategic blockade, preventing skilled players from joining rival teams.

This accumulation of quarterbacks across teams raises questions about each team's confidence in their top and backup options. It also sparks debate over the solidity of roster decisions made during the preseason and how these might affect the teams' performances in the upcoming games.