Sportsgrid Icon
Live NowLive
DIRECTV Image
Samsung TV Plus Image
Roku TV Image
Amazon Prime Video Image
FireTV Image
LG Channels Image
Vizio Image
Xiaomi Image
YouTube TV Image
FuboTV Image
Plex Image
Sling Tv Image
TCL Image
FreeCast Image
Sports.Tv Image
Stremium Image
Free Live Sports Image
YouTube Image
General · 2 hours ago

DraftKings Faces NCAA Lawsuit Over March Madness Trademark Use

Craig Mish

Craig Mish

Host · Writer

DraftKings Faces NCAA Lawsuit Over March Madness Trademark Use

Segment Spotlight: Quick Hits From NewsWire Live

DraftKings Faces Lawsuit Over NCAA Trademark Infringement

Just before the NCAA tournament, DraftKings was sued by the NCAA for allegedly infringing upon college basketball trademarks, notably the use of the term "March Madness." This lawsuit was filed as the tournament began, causing a stir in the sports and betting communities. DraftKings has defended its actions, stating that the phrase "March Madness" on their betting app is used to differentiate NCAA tournament games from other sports offerings. They argue that their usage does not infringe on the NCAA's trademarks since they are not using the March Madness logo but merely the name in a textual context to describe the games.

DraftKings further asserts that their use of the term is protected under the First Amendment, claiming that it constitutes free speech. This defense indicates that DraftKings believes there has been no wrongdoing on their part. In contrast, the NCAA is pushing for a swift legal resolution, urging the district court to expedite the case to prevent similar usage by DraftKings in next year's tournament. They are likely aiming to set a precedent that discourages other sportsbooks from similar practices.

It's interesting to note the broader impact of this lawsuit. For example, MGM has altered its terminology, now referring to NCAA tournament games as "men's March tournament games" instead of using "March Madness." This change highlights the caution other companies are taking in the wake of the lawsuit. Meanwhile, platforms without direct affiliations with the NCAA or NFL, like polymarket, continue to navigate trademark usage carefully, using terms like "the big game" to refer to the Super Bowl.

The case raises significant questions about trademark usage, the scope of intellectual property rights in sports, and the line between commercial utilization and free speech. The outcome of this legal battle will likely influence how sports-related terms can be used in commercial settings, especially in sports betting and related industries.

)