Sportsgrid Icon
Live NowLive
SportsGrid on DIRECTV
SportsGrid on Samsung TV Plus
SportsGrid on Roku TV
SportsGrid on Amazon Prime Video
SportsGrid on FireTV
SportsGrid on LG Channels
SportsGrid on Vizio
SportsGrid on Xiaomi
SportsGrid on YouTube TV
SportsGrid on FuboTV
SportsGrid on Plex
SportsGrid on Sling Tv
SportsGrid on TCL
SportsGrid on FreeCast
SportsGrid on Stremium
SportsGrid on Free Live Sports
SportsGrid on YouTube
NCAAF · 1 hour ago

Insight on Georgia vs. Tennessee State Betting Trends

Kevin Walsh

Kevin Walsh

Host · Writer

Insight on Georgia vs. Tennessee State Betting Trends

Segment Spotlight: Quick Hits From SportsGrid College Football Today

Insights on Georgia's Betting Trends and Matchup Against Tennessee State

Dave shared his insights on the upcoming Georgia vs. Tennessee State game, emphasizing the consistent trend of Georgia's performance against large spreads under coach Kirby Smart's tenure. He highlighted that Kirby Smart has a record of 0-15-1 against the spread when the line is 38 points or more. This statistic demonstrates how Smart typically does not drive his team to run up the score against FCS or non-power 5 teams.

Dave recalled an instance from a previous season when he was betting on Charlotte against Georgia, where he noted that Georgia, leading comfortably, did not score in the fourth quarter, thereby not covering the spread. This tendency, according to Dave, shows that Georgia does not apply excessive pressure in games where they have a significant lead, a stark contrast to other teams that might aggressively push to maximize their scores.

Discussing the current matchup, Dave noted the betting line for Georgia against Tennessee State is at 46.5 points. Despite the history of not covering large spreads, the point spread still suggests a significant advantage for Georgia. Dave plans to watch this closely, betting on Tennessee State to cover, based on the historical data he has followed over the years.

Additionally, he touched upon the strategy of betting the under in games with large spreads, explaining that the lower-scoring team often fails to contribute significantly to the total points, making the under a safer bet. This approach is consistent with his experience and observations from other games involving large spreads and mismatches. In conclusion, Dave's strategy revolves around historical patterns and outcomes, favoring trends over individual game specifics.