SportsGrid Inc logo
Live NowLive
DIRECTV
Samsung TV Plus
Roku TV
Amazon Prime Video
FireTV
LG Channels
Vizio
Xiaomi
YouTube TV
FuboTV
Plex
Sling Tv
VIDAA
TCL
FreeCast
Local Now
Sports.Tv
Stremium
Rad TV
Free Live Sports
YouTube

WATCH

NFL · 1 hour ago

Prediction Market Betting Surges Ahead of Super Bowl LX

Prediction Market Betting Surges Ahead of Super Bowl LX

Segment Spotlight: Quick Hits From The Craig Carton Show

Concerns Over the Unregulated Predictive Wagering Market during Major Sports Events

During a recent segment on the Craig Carton Show, discussions turned to the rapidly expanding predictive wagering market. Unlike traditional gambling, this form of betting is currently unregulated, allowing companies like Calhi, Polly Market, Robin Hood, and others, including mainstream sportsbooks such as FanDuel, DraftKings, and Bet MGM Fnatics, to engage fully in this multibillion-dollar sector.

This type of betting has become particularly relevant in states like California and Texas, where traditional sports betting is not legal. Predictive markets enable participants to place bets on the likelihood of specific outcomes, such as whether certain phrases will be mentioned during significant events like the Super Bowl.

Carton highlighted the lack of regulation as a critical issue, noting that nearly $50 million had been wagered on the occurrence of specific phrases during the Super Bowl broadcast. A particular example provided was whether any announcer would use the term "tush push." The unregulated nature of these bets means that broadcasters themselves could potentially influence the outcome, raising ethical concerns.

Moreover, if figures like NBC broadcaster Mike Tirico were approached by someone with a substantial bet placed on a specific phrase, they could, without legal repercussions, decide to mention it during the broadcast, directly affecting the betting result. Carton expressed concern over this scenario, suggesting it creates a moral grey area where the outcome of bets could easily be manipulated by those involved in the broadcast itself.

The show concluded by posing a broader question about the integrity of unregulated betting markets, especially when significant sums are at stake, and the outcomes can be influenced by individuals within the event broadcast team.

)